<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Facilitate Proceedings &#187; Collaboration Technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://facilitate.com/blog/index.php/category/topics/collaboration-technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://facilitate.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 00:56:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Select virtual meeting technology to support the group process, not the other way around</title>
		<link>http://facilitate.com/blog/index.php/2010/11/selecting-virtual-meeting-technology-for-interactive-meetings/</link>
		<comments>http://facilitate.com/blog/index.php/2010/11/selecting-virtual-meeting-technology-for-interactive-meetings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julia Young</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collaboration Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feature Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtual Meetings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collaboration and innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effective webinars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group decision support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meeting Design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://facilitate.com/blog/?p=1645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember that old piece of advice: Don't put the cart before the horse? The <strong>Number One Challenge</strong> that facilitators and trainers have with virtual meetings and webinars is: <em>How to keep participants engaged?</em> I suggest that this is directly related to the <strong>Number One Trap</strong> that we fall into when moving from face-to-face to virtual events: starting with a piece of technology and then trying to make engagement happen. While technology <em><strong>can</strong></em> <em><strong>accelerate</strong></em> great communication, meeting effectiveness and virtual teamwork, it <strong><em>cannot create</em></strong> it. Rather we need to 1) start with our meeting or learning objectives, 2) understand the different types of interaction we are seeking to create during different parts of our agenda or process and then 3) select technology to support the desired interaction.

In our workshops and webinars about <a href="http://www.facilitate.com/consulting/virtual-meetings-teams.html">leading virtual teams</a> and <a href="http://www.facilitate.com/consulting/virtual-meetings-teams.html">getting great results from virtual meetings</a>, we use the following schematic to discuss how to select virtual meeting technology to match the type of interaction we need.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember that old piece of advice: Don&#8217;t put the cart before the horse? The <strong>Number One Challenge</strong> that facilitators and trainers have with virtual meetings and webinars is: <em>How to keep participants engaged?</em> I suggest that this is directly related to the <strong>Number One Trap</strong> that we fall into when moving from face-to-face to virtual events: starting with a piece of technology and then trying to make engagement happen. While technology <em><strong>can</strong></em> <em><strong>accelerate</strong></em> great communication, meeting effectiveness and virtual teamwork, it <strong><em>cannot create</em></strong> it. Rather we need to 1) start with our meeting or learning objectives, 2) understand the different types of interaction we are seeking to create during different parts of our agenda or process and then 3) select technology to support the desired interaction.</p>
<p>In our workshops and webinars about <a href="http://www.facilitate.com/consulting/virtual-meetings-teams.html">leading virtual teams</a> and <a href="http://www.facilitate.com/consulting/virtual-meetings-teams.html">getting great results from virtual meetings</a>, we use the following schematic to discuss how to select virtual meeting technology to match the type of interaction we need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://facilitate.com/blog/index.php/2010/11/selecting-virtual-meeting-technology-for-interactive-meetings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPads Add Sizzle and Creativity to Meetings</title>
		<link>http://facilitate.com/blog/index.php/2010/11/ipads-add-sizzle-to-meetings/</link>
		<comments>http://facilitate.com/blog/index.php/2010/11/ipads-add-sizzle-to-meetings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danuta McCall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Collaboration Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feature Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collaboration and innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meeting Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Running Effective Meetings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://facilitate.com/blog/?p=1637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A  recent post on a site called<a title="iPad CTO" href="http://ipadcto.com/" target="_blank"> iPad CTO </a>caught my eye because its title : Increase Productivity with iPad-driven Business Meetings. <em>Yes indeed</em>! I thought – having just returned from an engagement where we used iPads to create a sense of intimate conversation amongst 400 people. The author of this post went on to posit: “<em>The legacy of business meetings – boring, counter-productive, and a constant interruption of real work – shows that little progress has been made over the last century ……There’s a chance iPad’s involvement and deep integration into the way meetings are organized and implemented can move the needle just enough to improve your meetings in significant ways</em>.”

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A  recent post on a site called<a title="iPad CTO" href="http://ipadcto.com/" target="_blank"> iPad CTO </a>caught my eye because its title : Increase Productivity with iPad-driven Business Meetings. <em>Yes indeed</em>! I thought – having just returned from an engagement where we used iPads to create a sense of intimate conversation amongst 400 people. The author of this post went on to posit: “<em>The legacy of business meetings – boring, counter-productive, and a constant interruption of real work – shows that little progress has been made over the last century ……There’s a chance iPad’s involvement and deep integration into the way meetings are organized and implemented can move the needle just enough to improve your meetings in significant ways</em>.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://facilitate.com/blog/index.php/2010/11/ipads-add-sizzle-to-meetings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 Tips For Using Smart Phones To Make Large Meetings Interactive</title>
		<link>http://facilitate.com/blog/index.php/2010/01/5-tips-for-using-smart-phones-to-make-large-meetings-interactive/</link>
		<comments>http://facilitate.com/blog/index.php/2010/01/5-tips-for-using-smart-phones-to-make-large-meetings-interactive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 03:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike McCall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Collaboration Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meeting Tech Talk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meeting Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Running Effective Meetings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://facilitate.com/blog/?p=1269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lately I’ve been interested in the use of smart phones paired with web-based tools to make meetings more interactive. (see blog post <a title="For This Meeting Turn On Your Smart Phones" href="http://facilitate.com/blog/index.php/2009/10/smart-phones-are-great-meeting-productivity-tools/" target="_blank">For This Meeting, Turn on Your Smart Phones</a>). Recently I helped facilitate a session of 150 people where a variety of smart phones were used to allow meeting attendees to provide instant input to the session organizers. There were several useful take-always from this experience.

<span style="color: #225576;">1- <strong>Explore what resources and tools you’ll need to achieve your meeting objectives</strong></span>
<ul>
	<li>If the objective is primarily to provide “information by presentation “, then making sure your speakers are available and setting up a good projection system may be all that you need. If your speakers can’t physically be present at the session you’ll need networking, video conferencing or telephony capabilities to enable their virtual presence.</li>
	<li>If, on the other hand,  your meeting process calls for an interactive session with group input (especially with a group of 50 people or more), using smart phones or other devices is a good way to efficiently collect the information from all participants without disrupting the meeting flow. Make sure that the majority of your audience own smart phones and that you offer alternative input options so no one feels excluded. Provide loaner smart phones or Apple iPod Touches , or have a few laptops around the room for people to use.</li>
</ul>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lately I’ve been interested in the use of smart phones paired with web-based tools to make meetings more interactive. (see blog post <a title="For This Meeting Turn On Your Smart Phones" href="http://facilitate.com/blog/index.php/2009/10/smart-phones-are-great-meeting-productivity-tools/" target="_blank">For This Meeting, Turn on Your Smart Phones</a>). Recently I helped facilitate a session of 150 people where a variety of smart phones were used to allow meeting attendees to provide instant input to the session organizers. There were several useful take-always from this experience.</p>
<p><span style="color: #225576;">1- <strong>Explore what resources and tools you’ll need to achieve your meeting objectives</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>If the objective is primarily to provide “information by presentation “, then making sure your speakers are available and setting up a good projection system may be all that you need. If your speakers can’t physically be present at the session you’ll need networking, video conferencing or telephony capabilities to enable their virtual presence.</li>
<li>If, on the other hand,  your meeting process calls for an interactive session with group input (especially with a group of 50 people or more), using smart phones or other devices is a good way to efficiently collect the information from all participants without disrupting the meeting flow. Make sure that the majority of your audience own smart phones and that you offer alternative input options so no one feels excluded. Provide loaner smart phones or Apple iPod Touches , or have a few laptops around the room for people to use.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://facilitate.com/blog/index.php/2010/01/5-tips-for-using-smart-phones-to-make-large-meetings-interactive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How To Use Social Networking Tools To Strengthen Virtual Collaboration</title>
		<link>http://facilitate.com/blog/index.php/2010/01/use-social-networking-to-strengthen-virtual-collaboration/</link>
		<comments>http://facilitate.com/blog/index.php/2010/01/use-social-networking-to-strengthen-virtual-collaboration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 22:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Settle-Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advisor's Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collaboration Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://facilitate.com/blog/?p=1255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently plunged (well, maybe dipped a toe or two) into the world of Twitter. It was inevitable, despite some of my early protestations. Pretty much all of my colleagues are doing it, as are my competitors, and more and more of my clients. Social networking (SN) tools like Twitter really are opening up new ways for virtual workers to connect, communicate and collaborate. SN tools do what email, instant messaging and other more traditional communications means cannot: <em><span style="color: #ff8000;"><strong>They foster emergence</strong></span><span style="color: #ff8000;">, <strong>meaning that people and groups can naturally and easily link together based on their common interests, skills or profiles, often with people they never even realized existed.</strong></span></em>

Of course, any tool can be disruptive in a group if used in inappropriate ways. Based on my work with clients and colleagues who work as part of geographically dispersed teams, here are just a few helpful ways to use SN tools.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently plunged (well, maybe dipped a toe or two) into the world of Twitter. It was inevitable, despite some of my early protestations. Pretty much all of my colleagues are doing it, as are my competitors, and more and more of my clients. Social networking (SN) tools like Twitter really are opening up new ways for virtual workers to connect, communicate and collaborate. SN tools do what email, instant messaging and other more traditional communications means cannot: <em><span style="color: #ff8000;"><strong>They foster emergence</strong></span><span style="color: #ff8000;">, <strong>meaning that people and groups can naturally and easily link together based on their common interests, skills or profiles, often with people they never even realized existed.</strong></span></em></p>
<p>Of course, any tool can be disruptive in a group if used in inappropriate ways. Based on my work with clients and colleagues who work as part of geographically dispersed teams, here are just a few helpful ways to use SN tools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://facilitate.com/blog/index.php/2010/01/use-social-networking-to-strengthen-virtual-collaboration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Matching Technology Tools to Collaboration Style</title>
		<link>http://facilitate.com/blog/index.php/2009/11/matching-technologytools-to-collaboration-style/</link>
		<comments>http://facilitate.com/blog/index.php/2009/11/matching-technologytools-to-collaboration-style/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 23:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danuta McCall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Collaboration Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://facilitate.com/blog/?p=1117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just read an interesting article published by eminent consulting firm McKinsey &#38; Company entitled “<em><strong>Using technology to improve workforce collaboration” </strong></em>(authors James Manyika, Kara Sprague and Lareina Yee). 

<strong><span style="color: #ff8000;">A new class of worker:  the Collaboration Worker</span></strong>

The authors recast the workforce sector known as Knowledge Workers (a venerable term coined by Peter Drucker in the mid 20th century) in terms of what most non-production or transaction workers do: collaborate to solve problems, nurture ideas, serve customers and engage with partners. Their research reveals that “the performance gap between top and bottom companies in collaboration-intense sectors is nine times that of production- or transaction-intense sectors”.  It follows then that productivity improvements in this sector of the workforce could have a significant impact on the bottom line.  As we have a plethora of collaboration tools available to us today, we’ve got ourselves a real opportunity to nail this one.  Right? <em><strong>Yes</strong></em> (the article describes how Cisco saved more than $100 million in travel and business expenses and increased productivity by 78 percent), <em><strong>and</strong></em> it’s not quite that simple.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read an interesting article published by eminent consulting firm McKinsey &amp; Company entitled “<em><strong>Using technology to improve workforce collaboration” </strong></em>(authors James Manyika, Kara Sprague and Lareina Yee). </p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff8000;">A new class of worker:  the Collaboration Worker</span></strong></p>
<p>The authors recast the workforce sector known as Knowledge Workers (a venerable term coined by Peter Drucker in the mid 20th century) in terms of what most non-production or transaction workers do: collaborate to solve problems, nurture ideas, serve customers and engage with partners. Their research reveals that “the performance gap between top and bottom companies in collaboration-intense sectors is nine times that of production- or transaction-intense sectors”.  It follows then that productivity improvements in this sector of the workforce could have a significant impact on the bottom line.  As we have a plethora of collaboration tools available to us today, we’ve got ourselves a real opportunity to nail this one.  Right? <em><strong>Yes</strong></em> (the article describes how Cisco saved more than $100 million in travel and business expenses and increased productivity by 78 percent), <em><strong>and</strong></em> it’s not quite that simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://facilitate.com/blog/index.php/2009/11/matching-technologytools-to-collaboration-style/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>For This Meeting Please Turn On Your Smart Phones</title>
		<link>http://facilitate.com/blog/index.php/2009/10/smart-phones-are-great-meeting-productivity-tools/</link>
		<comments>http://facilitate.com/blog/index.php/2009/10/smart-phones-are-great-meeting-productivity-tools/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike McCall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Collaboration Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meeting Tech Talk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphone applications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://facilitate.com/blog/?p=978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The days of starting a meeting with <em><span style="color: #29688e;"><strong>“Please turn off and put away your cell phones”</strong></span></em> are over. Smart phones are common these days in the business world and they can do just about anything.  Take this example: my iPhone allows me to scan optical bar codes and tells me whether there is a better deal online for an item I want to purchase.

<span style="color: #29688e;"><strong>Today, smart phones are front-line devices for collaborative work.</strong></span> With their growing sophistication we’re starting to see more interest in using them effectively to make meetings more productive.

I’m currently working with a company that is organizing a large conference for their customers.  They’d like to use smart phones to conduct simple voting, brainstorming and soliciting feedback on presentations.  They did a quick poll to find out which were the top 5 smart phones in use by their clients and came up with the following:
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The days of starting a meeting with <em><span style="color: #29688e;"><strong>“Please turn off and put away your cell phones”</strong></span></em> are over. Smart phones are common these days in the business world and they can do just about anything.  Take this example: my iPhone allows me to scan optical bar codes and tells me whether there is a better deal online for an item I want to purchase.</p>
<p><span style="color: #29688e;"><strong>Today, smart phones are front-line devices for collaborative work.</strong></span> With their growing sophistication we’re starting to see more interest in using them effectively to make meetings more productive.</p>
<p>I’m currently working with a company that is organizing a large conference for their customers.  They’d like to use smart phones to conduct simple voting, brainstorming and soliciting feedback on presentations.  They did a quick poll to find out which were the top 5 smart phones in use by their clients and came up with the following:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://facilitate.com/blog/index.php/2009/10/smart-phones-are-great-meeting-productivity-tools/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hand-Held Devices Offer New Meeting Design Options</title>
		<link>http://facilitate.com/blog/index.php/2009/08/hand-held-devices-offer-new-meeting-design-options/</link>
		<comments>http://facilitate.com/blog/index.php/2009/08/hand-held-devices-offer-new-meeting-design-options/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 18:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike McCall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Collaboration Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meeting Tech Talk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meeting Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphone applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology adoption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://facilitate.com/blog/?p=652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Just as computer keyboard skills were once an inhibiting factor in using technology for collaboration, is there a similar concern with Smart Phones, Blackberries, iPhones, iPod Touch’s or phone keypad devices?</em>

Back in the very early 90’s, when I first started exploring the use of computers for collaborative work, there were a number of technical issues.  Of course, in those days we had the usual issues of reliable networking, software and hardware infrastructure to support collaborative environments.  As challenging as these were however, the tougher issue for most organizations to address was whether managers and executives would resist participating in online collaboration if it meant that they needed to contribute via a computer keyboard.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Just as computer keyboard skills were once an inhibiting factor in using technology for collaboration, is there a similar concern with Smart Phones, Blackberries, iPhones, iPod Touch’s or phone keypad devices?</em></p>
<p>Back in the very early 90’s, when I first started exploring the use of computers for collaborative work, there were a number of technical issues.  Of course, in those days we had the usual issues of reliable networking, software and hardware infrastructure to support collaborative environments.  As challenging as these were however, the tougher issue for most organizations to address was whether managers and executives would resist participating in online collaboration if it meant that they needed to contribute via a computer keyboard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://facilitate.com/blog/index.php/2009/08/hand-held-devices-offer-new-meeting-design-options/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why PowerPoint Is Pervasive and Good Facilitation Is Not</title>
		<link>http://facilitate.com/blog/index.php/2009/06/why-powerpoint-is-pervasive-and-good-facilitation-is-not/</link>
		<comments>http://facilitate.com/blog/index.php/2009/06/why-powerpoint-is-pervasive-and-good-facilitation-is-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 16:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike McCall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Collaboration Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meeting Tech Talk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effective webinars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facilitation skills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Running Effective Meetings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtual Meetings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://facilitate.com/blog/?p=535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I believe it was Socrates who said “Even a fool can give a good PowerPoint presentation but it is only a truly wise person who can lead a group of people to think creatively and make decisions effectively and efficiently.”  At the risk of being deliberatively provocative, I maintain that this accounts for the prevalence of PowerPoint based meetings.


From childhood, though we may fear standing up in front of people, we are trained to present our ideas. We do it in school with the essays and papers we write, the science projects we – with that little bit of help from our parents - assemble and the tests we take. With that desire in all of us to produce beautiful things, by the time we enter the workforce we’re primed for the task of creating PowerPoint presentations. 

How many of us, however, were taught how to bring a group of people together for a purpose, structure a meeting agenda, start with a discussion to draw out the best and most innovative ideas from the group, keep people focused and lead them to  efficiently develop and prioritize those ideas, build consensus around the best ones and end with a decision or implementation plan? ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe it was Socrates who said “Even a fool can give a good PowerPoint presentation but it is only a truly wise person who can lead a group of people to think creatively and make decisions effectively and efficiently.”  At the risk of being deliberatively provocative, I maintain that this accounts for the prevalence of PowerPoint based meetings.</p>
<p>From childhood, though we may fear standing up in front of people, we are trained to present our ideas. We do it in school with the essays and papers we write, the science projects we – with that little bit of help from our parents &#8211; assemble and the tests we take. With that desire in all of us to produce beautiful things, by the time we enter the workforce we’re primed for the task of creating PowerPoint presentations. </p>
<p>How many of us, however, were taught how to bring a group of people together for a purpose, structure a meeting agenda, start with a discussion to draw out the best and most innovative ideas from the group, keep people focused and lead them to  efficiently develop and prioritize those ideas, build consensus around the best ones and end with a decision or implementation plan? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://facilitate.com/blog/index.php/2009/06/why-powerpoint-is-pervasive-and-good-facilitation-is-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Which Collaboration Tool Is Right For The Task At Hand?</title>
		<link>http://facilitate.com/blog/index.php/2009/06/which-collaboration-tool-is-right-for-the-task-at-hand/</link>
		<comments>http://facilitate.com/blog/index.php/2009/06/which-collaboration-tool-is-right-for-the-task-at-hand/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Collaboration Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facilitating Group Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://facilitate.com/blog/?p=584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<span style="color: #e56f19;"><strong>We're trying to answer this question from a facilitator perspective.</strong></span> Web collaboration tools should be a part of every facilitator's toolkit, but knowing which one to use to support each aspect of the group process is key. Just as using a screwdriver to hammer in a nail wouldn't work; using a web meeting tool for the wrong purpose could yield results you don't intend. Here is a link to <a title="Web Collaboration Tools Comparison " href="http://www.facilitate.com/collaboration-tools/#collaboration" target="_blank">our first attempt at mapping different categories of web collaboration tools </a>to different purposes, but we think that this concept would benefit from "collaborative" input. We invite you to suggest additions, subtractions and comments to make this chart more accurate and complete.

Here is the thought process behind this project:]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: #e56f19;"><strong>We&#8217;re trying to answer this question from a facilitator perspective.</strong></span> Web collaboration tools should be a part of every facilitator&#8217;s toolkit, but knowing which one to use to support each aspect of the group process is key. Just as using a screwdriver to hammer in a nail wouldn&#8217;t work; using a web meeting tool for the wrong purpose could yield results you don&#8217;t intend. Here is a link to <a title="Web Collaboration Tools Comparison " href="http://www.facilitate.com/collaboration-tools/#collaboration" target="_blank">our first attempt at mapping different categories of web collaboration tools </a>to different purposes, but we think that this concept would benefit from &#8220;collaborative&#8221; input. We invite you to suggest additions, subtractions and comments to make this chart more accurate and complete.</p>
<p>Here is the thought process behind this project:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://facilitate.com/blog/index.php/2009/06/which-collaboration-tool-is-right-for-the-task-at-hand/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where Facilitation and Social Networks Intersect</title>
		<link>http://facilitate.com/blog/index.php/2009/05/intersection-of-facilitation-and-social-networks/</link>
		<comments>http://facilitate.com/blog/index.php/2009/05/intersection-of-facilitation-and-social-networks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 10:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danuta McCall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Collaboration Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facilitating Group Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://facilitate.com/blog/?p=87</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An essential aspect of the philosophy behind social media is community ownership of information.  The advantages of this are the wide ranging input contributed by interactive members and the speed at which responses appear when the network is active. The disadvantages lie in the uncertainty about the accuracy of the information that is put out and the difficulty of sifting through the sprawl to find what is relevant to you. It becomes challenging to maintain focus, direction and deliberation. 

How do social media really impact collaboration? Sharing information builds relationships around a common interest. From this “community of interest” can emerge a collaborative solution or work product. What transforms it from community sharing to collaboration is an outcome-oriented facilitation process. And that's where facilitators come into the picture.
Several facilitators weigh in.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An essential aspect of the philosophy behind social media is community ownership of information.  The advantages of this are the wide ranging input contributed by interactive members and the speed at which responses appear when the network is active. The disadvantages lie in the uncertainty about the accuracy of the information that is put out and the difficulty of sifting through the sprawl to find what is relevant to you. It becomes challenging to maintain focus, direction and deliberation. </p>
<p>How do social media really impact collaboration? Sharing information builds relationships around a common interest. From this “community of interest” can emerge a collaborative solution or work product. What transforms it from community sharing to collaboration is an outcome-oriented facilitation process. And that&#8217;s where facilitators come into the picture.<br />
Several facilitators weigh in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://facilitate.com/blog/index.php/2009/05/intersection-of-facilitation-and-social-networks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

