Dear Collaboration Colleagues,
We’ve been talking up the International Association of Facilitators
Conference for the past few months because this is the one association
dedicated to the art and development of facilitation, a process
and core set of skills that are a key component of business leadership,
negotiation, conflict resolution, teaching and learning.
We asked some facilitation practitioners who attended the North
America Conference earlier this month to report back. Specifically
we asked “what did you take away that will be most valuable
to your own practice of facilitation?” We’ve selected
several vignettes to share with you in Gold
Nuggets from the IAF Conference.
Thanks
to all of you who participated in last month’s
interactive discussion. It makes this newsletter a vehicle for
sharing your knowledge as well as ours. We’re doing it
again this month, and invite even more of our readers to exchange
ideas in our Situation Room.
March
has been an exciting month for us. Not only did we provide online tools to engage 450
attendees in brainstorming at the IAF, but we
announced a new release, FacilitatePro 9.5, as well. We’re still trying to catch our breaths!
Merry Spring to all,
The Facilitation Enthusiasts at Facilitate.com
The Situation Room
Reporting back on our experiment in interactive discussion,
we asked you our readers to participate in an idea exchange on
how to handle a situation where two senior managers “show up” late to a
teleconference and want to interrupt the discussion so that they
can catch up. Click
here to view the whole discussion on our interactive flipchart and add
your own comments.
Our participants were clear about one thing: we do not interrupt
the meeting flow and risk losing the group’s momentum. Several
suggested explaining that the group needed to keep going after
a very short summary, with an offer to provide further detail
after the meeting. Another idea is to designate a “catch-up” person
ahead of time to handle the update off-line using email or instant
messaging. Depending on the situation, it might be appropriate
to revisit meeting ground rules.
And a good rule of thumb is to keep meetings to the smallest number
of critical people.
This was so much fun, we’d like to do it again! Interaction
is habit-forming, and before you know it – you’re part of a community
of interest and a resource to each other. Here’s the next situation
for you to ponder:
How would you handle
this situation?
You have 10 minutes to establish trust among a new team.
You're managing a new team that will work together remotely over
a long period of time. You know that trusting relationships will
be important, but you have very little time on each call as it
is, and these are busy people. You'd like to try a 10
minute trust exercise on this conference call – what
might you do?
Please click
here to post your suggestions to our interactive flipchart and comment on the other ideas you find there. We’ll report back on this experiment in idea exchange in the next issue.
top
Advisor's Corner
Gold Nuggets from the IAF Conference
Prospectors panning for gold trained their eyes to spot the gold nugget. We use the term to mean that special insight that is particularly timely and makes the experience worthwhile. Here are some gold nuggets from the IAF Conference in Portland this month.
The Magic of Metaphors
Shelley Rueger
Program Manager, Hewlett Packard
Editor’s note: Shelley reports on a workshop that
introduced participants to a five-step process developed by
Simon Wilson and
Carol Sherriff. The process begins with “catching” and
exploring the group’s metaphor and ends with applying what
the group learned to the issue under discussion.
As a relatively inexperienced facilitator attending her first conference, I was somewhat taken aback to find that my first pre-conference workshop,
"The Magic of Metaphors, the Art of Archetypes" led by Carol Sherriff and Simon Wilson, would only have four participants -
too few for there to be any way for me to "hide". My concern quickly evaporated. The subject matter was engaging -
I went from being a skeptic, who thought this metaphor stuff was a bunch of hocus pocus, to seeing the potential for
unlocking creativity in a wide assortment of engagements with a vast array of personality types.
Metaphors
are built into human conversation. They give us an inside view
of how people think. Groups and organizations have metaphors,
and they can help us identify and talk about issues in a less
emotional context. If we act as if the metaphor is true, we
can work on an issue through the metaphor.
I
have already been able to apply the knowledge I gained in several
meetings - even with people who generally do not take to "soft" types
of facilitation methods. For example, I was talking with a
senior manager of one of our R&D groups about a sensitive issue
regarding the performance of one of his teams. He described
the situation
that the team was facing as "McDonald's
when a bus pulls up". Rather than ignore the
use of metaphor, I kept him talking in terms of the metaphor
instead of directly at the problem. I think we got further
speaking that way than
we would have if we had be outside the metaphor where the emotions
were more raw.
Ground Rules that Go Deeper
Dan Hogan
Lord & Hogan
Editor’s
Note: Dan reports on a workshop presented by Roger
Schwarz and Anne Davidson based on their “Skilled Facilitator Approach” – a values-based, systems approach for creating highly effective
groups and organizations.
Once again, I left the conference energized having picked up several new ideas. One stand-out was the Ground Rules for Effective
Groups presented by Roger Schwarz and Anne Davidson. There are nine of these ground rules and they go deeper
than commonly used ones like “be on time”, deeper in the sense that they give boundaries how to act and communicate. The ground rules are:
- Test assumptions and inferences
- Share all relevant information
- Use specific examples and agree on what important words mean
- Explain your reasoning and intent
- Focus on interests; not positions
- Combine advocacy and inquiry
- Jointly design next steps and ways to test disagreements
- Discuss undiscussible issues
- Use a decision-making rule that generates the right level of commitment
Here is an example. In some recent sessions I facilitated, there were engineers and drafting people who had to work together to create a quality product.
But a few of these teams didn’t get along; they struggled to discuss even their own work process. Applying the ground rule to test assumptions and inferences, I
pointed out that when someone says, “You are not hearing me….”, this is in fact an assumption that needs to be tested by saying something like “It seems to me
that you are not hearing what I’m trying to say. Would you try to repeat what you think my point is?” These ground rules are so clear that when I used them
in 5 different teams, they really set the tone for functional dialogue.
The
Wisdom of Teams
Karen Bading
Infrasonics Coaching
Editors Note: Karen is describing her experience during the Plenary Session, which addressed
the topic of organizational change through a keynote speech followed by idea generation via a series of short encounters in small groups.
There
were many moments of learning and connection for me at the IAF Conference
in Portland. What stands out are two parts of the opening plenary. In the Brief
Encounters, thinking about strategies for organizational change, I heard half
a dozen different answers to my question, “How do we help executives hold focus on a change effort long enough for individual behavior to change across the organization?” (Most answers had something to do with careful contracting with realistic time frames.)
In
the closing activity, sharing tools and strategies around the table, my
big ‘ah-ha’ was the approach of a facilitator working with a “team for team’s
sake.” Rather than try to sell his resistant team on the group process,
the facilitator simply began gathering information, both in meetings and
informally. He then wrote a draft report with recommendations and it presented
to the group, letting
them be the judge of their wisdom as a team.
“We said all that?” they asked. As they saw how their ideas
came together to create something greater than the sum of the parts, they
were more willing to continue collaborating.
I was humbly reminded that sometimes the work is the work.
Finally,
the plenary spilled over into lunch conversations and I’m still pondering the chicken-egg relationship of culture and individual behavior in an organizational change effort. In a sense, culture is a summary of observed individual behavior, so unless behavior changes the culture is unchanged. I wonder if we start at the wrong end of culture change when we describe the vision for the transformed organization broadly rather than describing the transformed behavior of each stakeholder that will be observable evidence of the shift and putting our energy into creating those changes such that we can eventually see and hear a new organizational culture.
Keeping the Cart Ahead the Horse
Madeline Brane, PMP, CPF
Blue Shield of California
In his opening comments the IAF Chair, Cameron Fraser, highlighted two trends in facilitation:
1. An increase in the number of internal facilitators
2. The expanded use of virtual meetings
Since I am an internal facilitator who conducts frequent virtual meetings, this got my attention. I attended my last conference three years
ago, and this demonstrated a notable shift in the role of facilitation. In the pre-conference workshop "Getting
Great Results from Virtual Meetings", we explored different approaches to keeping virtual teams engaged while delivering productive
results. An important principle is to first plan your session just as you would today, determining the objectives, goals,
and processes to be used, and only then consider ways to incorporate virtual tools.
As an example, take a typical in-person facilitation session. Often we plan activities like brainstorming, ranking and rating to aid in accomplishing the goals of the session.
These activities can be quite time consuming, and people may be worn out before it’s time to start reviewing results
and planning next steps. With web meeting tools like FacilitatePro, you could perform these steps asynchronously prior to the meeting. Then you
could conduct a virtual meeting using online tools like FacilitatePro, Live Meeting or WebEx to walk though results and plan next steps.
The pre-session activities help get the team onboard and aligned on the work to be done.
Future IAF sessions will undoubtedly continue to focus on the exciting developments in virtual communication.
I encourage you to incorporate the use of technology into your facilitation toolkit.
Turning Ideas into Actions
Cindy Ray, MBA, CPF
Coordinator Healthcare Improvement
Peacehealth
Editor’s note: the keynote speaker, who kicked off the plenary session activities, was Dan Cohen, co-author of “The
Heart of Change: Real Life Stories of How People Change Their Organizations”
The conference this year was well organized, interesting and of course, spending
time with fellow practitioners is always inspiring. One thing that stands
out for me about the conference was the theme "Bridging Ideas to Action". Over the last year and a half
I have seen my teams generate some really great ideas but struggle to get them implemented due to organizational barriers. The keynote speaker was
the perfect jumping off point for me to ponder how to continue to move our organization over the bridge to action. I gained a deeper appreciation for
the following change principles:
- Think about possible barriers and their mitigations ahead of time
- Have clear parameters and ‘non-negotiables’ outlined ahead
of time so people are clear about what will or will not be done
- Communicate, communicate, communicate, in all directions, in many mediums,
all the time
And on a personal note, I had been mulling over an idea for a book for a
while. The idea of bridging ideas to action was exactly the motivation
I needed, in addition to talking with so many inspiring practitioners, to
set foot on that bridge! I started on the book as soon as I got home
and have the first five chapters hammered out already! Who knows - it
may be
available next year in the bookstore at the IAF conference. Thanks IAF!
top
Have you added your ideas on our situation yet?
Come on, don’t be shy. All responses are anonymous, and besides, there’s no such thing as a bad idea!
Click here to participate.
top
Buzz About Meeting Effectiveness
Note: We’ve discovered that people seem to enjoy the articles and blogs that we select because they contain interesting opinions or advice about facilitation and collaboration.
It’s probably time that we let you know that this doesn’t imply that we
recommend or endorse the effectiveness or accuracy of any particular
statement or technique that you may find here.
And here's what popped up on the web:
02.22.2007 Meetings make us dumber, or do they?
"Meetings make us dumber, study shows
- Brainstorming sessions backfire when group thinking clouds
decisions". The
title of this short article was attention getting, to say
the least.
The
finding
came
from
a study
of consumer
behavior that showed that participants had more trouble
coming up with alternative brands in a group than when
they were alone. The researchers inferred
that this finding could also apply to decisions in the
boardroom, in that “groupthink” could be a
limiting factor in generating alternative ideas. What was
quite fascinating (assuming you have some free time on
your hands) were the associated poll and discussion board.
Poll: Do you have too many meetings at work? Out of 5660
responses 81% said "My mind goes blank after a couple
of them a day” and 59% said “Good ideas rarely
come out of my meetings. The same people usually dominate
the discussions.”
We
picked out a couple of wise reactions from the discussion board,
to wit: "I think the results of this study would be inconclusive
if
they
first filtered
out "useless" meetings,
then of the people who attend useful meetings, examined their
performance when working by themselves.” And: "A
brainstorming session can be fun and productive provided materials
are included
to enhance the experience, respect is a ground rule within
the group, and there is follow-up on ideas presented.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17279961/
Facilitate.com: Of Interest
Rave Reviews for "Getting Great Results from Virtual Meetings"
"..very worthwhile experiencing
the technology and seeing the different possibilities for integrating
technology with our facilitative techniques. “
“Loved the group brainstorming, both virtually and in the game”
“Of particular value was doing the pre-work building up to the face
to face session”
“I'm building awareness that there are key tools that could enhance
my work...and it's within my reach...”
Contact
us to bring this workshop to your organization.
FacilitatePro 9.5 launched at IAF Conference
Click here to view press release.
Any of you who have perused the side bar know that FacilitatePro
is a web-based software tool that helps facilitators run more effective
meetings virtually or face-to-face. Leveraging our combined decades
of experience facilitating groups of all types through decision making processes
of all
kinds, we’ve included tools for anonymous brainstorming, idea generation
and evaluation, prioritization and voting, surveying and action
planning. With every release we’ve added more options for facilitators
to enhance group dynamics, encourage innovative thinking and streamline
decision making.
With 9.5 we’ve added lots of new features from our customers’ wish
lists as well as simplifying navigation so that even a novice facilitator
can get off to a fast start.
We
could go on and on, but instead we invite you to learn more
about FacilitatePro 9.5 by taking a minute to read the
Product Overview and visit our web site.
http://www facilitate.com/Announce/95ProductOverview.pdf
, please send us an email with
"unsubscribe
NOT ON OUR DISTRIBUTION LIST?
If someone forwarded this newsletter to you and you would like to
continue to receive them monthly, please
sign up now.