View newsletter archive
Sign up to receive Facilitate Proceedings via email.


Dear Collaboration Colleagues,

It’s June and that means summer solstice, graduations, family vacations – we focus on clearing our desks so that we can enjoy the lengthened daylight hours. As soon as we send this newsletter off, we're headed to the beach (just kidding); actually we’re lining up some great articles for the months to come, so stay tuned.

Last month’s Facilitate Proceedings was devoted to exploring Web 2.0 in the context of group facilitation. We think we struck a chord, both from the comments on our interactive flipchart and some email responses that came back to us. Many facilitation practitioners feel the mandate to establish their own positions with respect to incorporating interactive web technology into meeting and business processes. We feel that web technology gives us unprecedented opportunities to expand the breadth and reach of our individual consulting practices, or become agents of collaborative change within our organizations. But first we need to understand the landscape.

That’s why you’ll see some interesting offerings at the 2008 International Association of Facilitators (IAF) conference in Atlanta in April 2008. Some of us at Facilitate.com are involved in programming for this conference, so we’ve had a sneak peak at the content tracks. This year's technology track explores the role of social media in facilitation, how to use web technology to support global teams, identifying the right tool for the job, and using Web 2.0 tools to help run your consulting business. And of course, there are plenty of the more traditional dimensions of facilitation and collaboration. There will be a call for proposals coming shortly and we will pass on the information to you. We’d love some to see some of our readers on the speakers list!

This week our Advisor's Corner features one of our favorite associates, Nancy Settle-Murphy, who advises us to blend different types of facilitated sessions to boost virtual teams. And as always, we ask you to participate in our community of interest by engaging in online discussion in our Situation Room. Thanks to you, we are defining our own Web 2.0 entity: this isn’t a blog or a wiki or a social network – this is (drumroll please) e-Newsletter 2.0!

Best summertime wishes,

The e-meeting Epicures at Facilitate.com

 


Advisor's Corner

Boost your teams using “blended facilitation”

Nancy Settle-Murphy
Guided Insights
www.guidedinsights.com

Let’s say you have a geographically dispersed team that’s pressured to deliver results within an absurdly tight timeframe. You’re challenged to tap everyone’s best thinking as efficiently and effectively as possible, keeping the team engaged and focused on shared goals. Some participants are able to convene face-to-face while others are forced to participate remotely.

“Blended facilitation” enables members of a hybrid team to make the most out of their meeting time, wherever they are. By blended facilitation we mean using a combination of facilitation tools and approaches, either synchronously (in “real-time”), asynchronously (at different times) or both. There’s no single solution that applies to all situations, but consider these guidelines when determining how to plan the kind of conversations that will yield the richest results in the shortest time.

  • Think twice about having some people participate in person while others join remotely. This dynamic tends to create an uneven playing field and inhibits open sharing among all. Better to have everyone participate remotely, with equal access to the same technology. Or, if you want to take advantage of face-to-face interactions by those who can get together in one room, use that face time to plow through the work that can more easily be done eyeball to eyeball, and share the results with the rest of the team. If you must bring together co-located and remote members on a call, adapt the agenda to minimize the time the remote people must spend on the phone.

  • Plan your agendas to encourage engaging conversations that will accelerate time to results. Assume that a group will lose focus after 60 minutes on a conference call—90 minutes tops. This means no more tedious slide decks or extended report-outs on the call. Instead, send them out or post them ahead of time. Asking people to do a little homework (e.g. bring “three top ideas” or “two major challenges”) is a great way to encourage people to pay attention to prework. Send agendas in advance, along with explicitly-stated intended outcomes, so all have a chance to prepare.

  • Make use of asynchronous web meeting software to augment same-time meetings. This works especially well when participants work across time zones and speak multiple languages. If you open an online conference a few days before the same-time meeting, you can solicit vital input to help sharpen the focus of your meeting. It also provides an easier way to assess priorities, issues and ideas, saving you valuable phone time later on. When everyone finally meets in real-time, you can share results and jump right into the needed conversation.

  • Pair web-based tools with phone for a really productive working session. Say you have 12 people on a call. If you poll each one sequentially about top challenges or new product ideas, those who are not talking may tune out quickly. Instead, set up a virtual conference space that people can use while they are together on the phone. Consider which topics lend themselves to electronic brainstorming, and which are better addressed through an open discussion. Make use of voting, action planning and priority-setting capabilities as well.

  • Consider cultural differences when thinking through the facilitation options. Especially when people don’t guage, providing multiple communication paths will elicit more participation from everyone. For example, if you went around the virtual room and asked each person to name challenges or propose ideas, you might find very different responses. Some cultures place a high value on hierarchy and seniority. Others relish a high-spirited debate over differences, while some seek to preserve group harmony at all costs. Some people may feel more comfortable communicating verbally, while others may be more confident when expressing views in writing. For all of these reasons, giving people a choice between verbal and written input on a team call is often the wisest approach for removing barriers to participation and eliciting the best ideas.

  • Maintain momentum through frequent asynchronous communications. When teams work from a distance, out of sight really can be mean out of mind. Establish conventions about how, when, where and to whom vital group communications will take place. Find ways to keep members of the group working together between meetings and milestones by using multiple channels, both synchronous and asynchronous. Make use of shared portals to share progress, review and edit documents, raise issues, and generate ideas. Consider, for example, setting up a permanent asynch meeting area where you pose a topical question to the team every week or so and send via email. Once a critical mass of people has responded, you can share responses at team meetings, via email, or ask people to view online. This can help keep the team engaged and cross-pollinating knowledge and ideas even when they are not meeting in real-time.

top


Situation Room

The Vote's Not In Yet

Reporting back on last week’s interactive discussion, we asked you, our readers, to comment on whether Web 2.0 has the potential to help us better facilitate groups. Click here to view the whole discussion on our interactive flip chart and add your own comments.

To be honest, as a community we’re not quite sure of the answer. We generally love the freedom and intimacy of web applications like Attendr, but we express some scepticism when it comes to envisioning these tools playing a role in the corporate setting. The moderates suggest that Web 2.0 tools might be considered a “complementary medium” rather than an alternative to traditional meetings. Whether or not we are of common mind that the openness and transparency of Web 2.0 supports the group process, we seem to agree that these tools don’t take away from the role of the facilitator. In fact, we have the opportunity to become the leaders in demonstrating the value of these tools, reaching out to engage participants and building confidence in the process.

So let’s explore this a little more. Here’s another situation to tackle.

top

Become an interactive e-newsletter reader!

How do you get a group to adopt a new technology when they're perfectly happy with the ways things are, thank you very much? Here's the situation:
Few people are familiar with the technology you plan to use. You have the client's buy-in to use a web-based brainstorming tool. You don't know how familiar people are with the technology or how technology will affect the group's interaction. How do you prepare your participants for a successful experience?

Click here to add your ideas and comments.

top


Buzz About Collaboration

 

06.17.2007 Just because you can, doesn't mean you should

A quick little case study about a company that is designing a new building to increase collaboration. They are getting rid of cubicles and are considering eliminating conference rooms as well. The company has implemented all sorts of technology solutions to support their virtual workers, but their corporate workers still trudge down the hall to attend generally unproductive meetings. The author suggested to them that the benefits of virtual meetings apply to co-located teams as well. Why not allow people to meet more productively from their offices? Why not eliminate some meetings altogether by having them collaborate asynchronously, using wikis or web meeting tools? As this is the whole purpose of our business, we were nodding our heads vigorously at this one.
http://www.collaborationloop.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2157&Itemid=39

top


Facilitate.com: Of Interest

Breakthrough conversations for bottomline results

We are pleased to announce that our associate, Nancy Settle-Murphy, has launched a new company called Guided Insights, after operating as Chrysalis International Inc. for more than 13 years. Nancy says: “We are excited about the new name because we believe it communicates more clearly the nature of our work and the value we deliver to clients. Our new tagline "Breakthrough Conversations for Bottom-line Results" emphasizes our ultimate goal when working with clients, to help them achieve real business results from the conversations we facilitate.” Visit Guided Insights at http://www.guidedinsights.com.

Facilitate.com welcomes new clients

New York & Company
State of Vermont
University of East Anglia

top


, please send us an email with "unsubscribe

NOT ON OUR DISTRIBUTION LIST?
If someone forwarded this newsletter to you and you would like to continue to receive them monthly, please sign up now.